Peter Smith
⬤ Grok 4 has taken the top spot among AI portfolios right out of the gate, according to performance tracking from Rallies. Early data shows the model building a clear lead over nine competing AI systems, with performance gaps forming quickly across the field.
⬤ The numbers tell a straightforward story: Grok 4 posted an opening return of approximately 11.2%, putting it firmly in first place. Claude Sonnet 4.5 came in second with around 7.4%, while Gemini 2.5 Pro grabbed third at roughly 5.5%. From there, returns drop off—Opus 4.5, Deepseek V3, and GPT 5.2 showed smaller gains between 4.2% and 0.6%, with several other portfolios either flat or in the red.
⬤ Account values reflect the performance spread. Grok 4 leads with about $111,156, compared to $107,391 for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and $105,491 for Gemini 2.5 Pro. The performance chart shows most portfolios trending upward over the same window, but Grok 4's gains accelerated faster, creating visible separation from the pack. Win-rate data also varies significantly across models, highlighting differences in both consistency and raw returns.
⬤ These early rankings show how fast performance gaps can open up among AI-driven portfolios. Strong initial returns shape short-term positioning, expectations, and sentiment within the AI segment. As the tracking period continues, market watchers will be looking to see whether Grok 4 holds its lead or if competing models close the distance as conditions shift.
Peter Smith
