Eseandre Mordi
● Tech expert Peter recently shared a hands-on comparison of the three major AI platforms — ChatGPT-5, Claude 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 — testing them across ten different everyday and professional scenarios. His findings, highlighted by Kol Tregaskes, give a clear picture of which tool fits which job best.
● Peter discovered that each AI has distinct advantages. ChatGPT-5 wins on speed and clarity, making it ideal for quick answers and general conversation. But when it comes to creative writing that needs personality and depth, it falls short. That's where Claude 4.5 stands out — it can learn your writing style and produce content that actually sounds like you wrote it. The downside? If you rely too heavily on one tool, usage caps and access limits can throw off your workflow.
● For developers and businesses, Peter suggests mixing models strategically. Claude Code and OpenAI Codex handle debugging and code fixes best, while Gemini pulls real-time web data faster than the others. Companies can optimize costs by using Claude for documentation, ChatGPT for meeting notes and summaries, and Gemini for analytics and search — balancing subscription fees with actual productivity gains.
● Peter's review also shows how these AI ecosystems are splitting into niches. Gemini's Nano Banana leads in image creation, and Veo 3.1 dominates video generation, though Peter still prefers OpenAI's Sora for personal video projects. He wasn't impressed with Elon Musk's Grok, calling it too casual for serious work. It's a sign that AI tools are carving out specific roles — from personal helpers to enterprise infrastructure — in what's now a $100+ billion productivity market.
Eseandre Mordi
